<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The V7N SEO Blog &#187; Link Buying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/category/link-buying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Link Buying As A Litmus Test</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/07/09/link-buying-as-a-litmus-test/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/07/09/link-buying-as-a-litmus-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Buying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/07/09/link-buying-as-a-litmus-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An angry website owner recently contacted me, accusing me of ranking a web site above their own. 

They had gone through the backlinks of a competitor and found many blog links. Thinking that they had bought links from V7N&#8217;s Contextual Link Network, I was promptly accused of being a defacer of the Internet. 
My response:
First [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/07/09/link-buying-as-a-litmus-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs SEO Strategy</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/16/google-vs-seo-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/16/google-vs-seo-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 01:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Buying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/16/google-vs-seo-strategy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following on from the paid links debate&#8230;.
People appear to be speculating that if sites are selling paid links, they&#8217;ll be banned. I think that&#8217;s pretty unlikely, as why would Google want the resulting bad publicity?
More likely they&#8217;ll simply devalue the outbounds, as I suspect they&#8217;ve been doing for some time. It&#8217;s pretty hard to tell, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/16/google-vs-seo-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Links May Or May Not Be Evil</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/15/links-are-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/15/links-are-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 23:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Link Buying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/15/links-are-evil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the ongoing battle against the forces of evil, and anything that may disrupt Google&#8217;s profit potential, Matt Cutts appears to be in wind-up mode:
&#8220;One thing I heard at SES London was that people wanted a way to report paid links specifically. Iâ€™d like to get a few paid link reports anyway because Iâ€™m excited [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/15/links-are-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
