<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Does Google Have A Supplemental Index?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechDuke</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-44765</link>
		<dc:creator>TechDuke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 22:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-44765</guid>
		<description>What I have noticed is about supps is that. When a new page is created on a website, Google indexes it and wait a some time to check it gets any backlinks, else it puts them in supplemental. Its especially the case with newer sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have noticed is about supps is that. When a new page is created on a website, Google indexes it and wait a some time to check it gets any backlinks, else it puts them in supplemental. Its especially the case with newer sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-40272</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-40272</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Iâ€™ve seen good sites, with good pages go into the supps.

Ditto. Link quality, mostly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>Iâ€™ve seen good sites, with good pages go into the supps.</p>
<p>Ditto. Link quality, mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dburdon</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/comment-page-1/#comment-39223</link>
		<dc:creator>dburdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/04/26/why-does-google-have-a-supplemental-index/#comment-39223</guid>
		<description>Pete,

I&#039;ve seen good sites, with good pages go into the supps. If they meet a quality threshold they soon reappear. If they don&#039;t, they&#039;re effectively finished.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen good sites, with good pages go into the supps. If they meet a quality threshold they soon reappear. If they don&#8217;t, they&#8217;re effectively finished.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

