Comments on: Ranking Without Links http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/ Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:10:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: 23 Link Building Tips | dunbeacon.net http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-73076 23 Link Building Tips | dunbeacon.net Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:55:04 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-73076 [...] in search engine optimization. Why? One of the major factor Google Search results work on Links. Without links, you would really get have a hard time ranking. These are tips to build links I compiled from my own experience & authority [...] [...] in search engine optimization. Why? One of the major factor Google Search results work on Links. Without links, you would really get have a hard time ranking. These are tips to build links I compiled from my own experience & authority [...]

]]> By: Philippine Webmaster Blog - Paradise Philippines | Building Links Like A Madman http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-63491 Philippine Webmaster Blog - Paradise Philippines | Building Links Like A Madman Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:17:27 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-63491 [...] is a very important factor in search engine optimization. Without links, you would really get have a hard time ranking. These are tips to build links I compiled from my own experience and authority [...] [...] is a very important factor in search engine optimization. Without links, you would really get have a hard time ranking. These are tips to build links I compiled from my own experience and authority [...]

]]> By: V7N Search Marketing News » Blog Archive » John Scott on Link Building http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-40467 V7N Search Marketing News » Blog Archive » John Scott on Link Building Wed, 02 May 2007 15:44:27 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-40467 [...] As Google’s algorithm advanced, search engine optimization professionals who were stuck in 2002 found their techniques to be ineffective and even counterproductive. Some SEO’s started claiming that links didn’t matter anymore, even though all evidence is to the contrary. [...] [...] As Google’s algorithm advanced, search engine optimization professionals who were stuck in 2002 found their techniques to be ineffective and even counterproductive. Some SEO’s started claiming that links didn’t matter anymore, even though all evidence is to the contrary. [...]

]]> By: mcharvet http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-34355 mcharvet Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:05:02 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-34355 interesting.... can inbound links really be as powerful to rankings as outbound (meaning those linking to you)? interesting…. can inbound links really be as powerful to rankings as outbound (meaning those linking to you)?

]]> By: fastcart http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-30898 fastcart Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:49:01 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-30898 Links are everything regardless of strategy. This is why older domains can sometimes be a good idea if you can pick one up with a ton of inbound links already. However, MSN seems to treat newer sites quite well as long as you have the inbounds. If you've got the link volume, MSN can be a healthy traffic source. Links are everything regardless of strategy. This is why older domains can sometimes
be a good idea if you can pick one
up with a ton of inbound links already.

However, MSN seems to treat newer sites
quite well as long as you have the inbounds. If you’ve got the link volume, MSN can be a
healthy traffic source.

]]> By: dylanloh.com http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-24987 dylanloh.com Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:31:03 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-24987 What about links from 'authority' sites like Ezinearticles and web2.0 sites like Squidoo? I don't think they will be 'dropping off' anytime soon in the forseeable future... What about links from ‘authority’ sites like Ezinearticles and web2.0 sites like Squidoo?

I don’t think they will be ‘dropping off’ anytime soon in the forseeable future…

]]> By: John Scott http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18499 John Scott Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:05:36 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18499 I do not believe that "heavy linking" works. Like you said, those sites drop off in an update - that update was several years ago. Smart linking works, and it will continue to work, because it is editorially based. If Google tried to ax editorial links, they would be left with AltaVista of ten years ago. I do not believe that “heavy linking” works. Like you said, those sites drop off in an update - that update was several years ago.

Smart linking works, and it will continue to work, because it is editorially based. If Google tried to ax editorial links, they would be left with AltaVista of ten years ago.

]]> By: links for 2007-02-28 » mhinze.com http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18411 links for 2007-02-28 » mhinze.com Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:57 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18411 [...] Ranking Without Links true: If there is no competition for the term and no traffic for the term, it really isn’t called ranking, is it? [...] [...] Ranking Without Links true: If there is no competition for the term and no traffic for the term, it really isn’t called ranking, is it? [...]

]]> By: aaronpratt http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18342 aaronpratt Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:02:10 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18342 I agree that sites need links to a point, I would also like to make you aware of multiple algorithms for different types of sites. Links are relative, so if you niche is one that is not based on the number of links, you are required few to rank. For example, trying to rank for "SEO" related things is hell if you do not play the linking game. BUT you are right Scott, links are still a major part of ranking in search engines but over time engines will become smarter. This is why heavy linkig works until the sites drop off in an "update", the sites I care about do not do this because they obtain links @ a natural organic pace. I agree that sites need links to a point, I would also like to make you aware of multiple algorithms for different types of sites. Links are relative, so if you niche is one that is not based on the number of links, you are required few to rank. For example, trying to rank for “SEO” related things is hell if you do not play the linking game.

BUT you are right Scott, links are still a major part of ranking in search engines but over time engines will become smarter. This is why heavy linkig works until the sites drop off in an “update”, the sites I care about do not do this because they obtain links @ a natural organic pace.

]]> By: Ranking Without Links http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18032 Ranking Without Links Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:38:46 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/#comment-18032 [...] Comment here: http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/ [...] [...] Comment here: http://blog.v7n.com/2007/02/26/ranking-without-links/ [...]

]]>