<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googles Achilles&#8217; Heel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/comment-page-1/#comment-8884</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/#comment-8884</guid>
		<description>Good points, Florin. 

Webmasters do look at Google differently, often depending on how the delicate symbiotic relationship is balanced on that day :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Florin. </p>
<p>Webmasters do look at Google differently, often depending on how the delicate symbiotic relationship is balanced on that day <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florin Costache</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/comment-page-1/#comment-8882</link>
		<dc:creator>Florin Costache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2007/01/28/googles-achilles-heel/#comment-8882</guid>
		<description>Like many have said before, Google is reactive rather than proactive, and many of us webmasters have our pet peeves with them mostly because of this.

The difference is that to the common internet user Google is the best and can &quot;do no evil&quot;. The problems webmasters and SEOs run into don&#039;t really exist for the rest of the world, so I&#039;d say that they do a pretty good job marketing themselves to the average Joe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many have said before, Google is reactive rather than proactive, and many of us webmasters have our pet peeves with them mostly because of this.</p>
<p>The difference is that to the common internet user Google is the best and can &#8220;do no evil&#8221;. The problems webmasters and SEOs run into don&#8217;t really exist for the rest of the world, so I&#8217;d say that they do a pretty good job marketing themselves to the average Joe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

