<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Bait Backfire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3518</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3518</guid>
		<description>Don't mind me, Chris. Just my personal view of what is now a long established, widespread trend :) You can forgive us old search hacks for getting a little jaded, at times. I subscribed to your blog.

Gavin - hey, thanks for commenting! And your kind words. I've added your blog to my daily reading list.

I agree with you. I think link baiting when combined with reader value is fine, but there appears to be a growing trend where writers appear to forget about the latter and place too much emphasis on the former.

Which leads to a credibility problem, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t mind me, Chris. Just my personal view of what is now a long established, widespread trend <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> You can forgive us old search hacks for getting a little jaded, at times. I subscribed to your blog.</p>
<p>Gavin - hey, thanks for commenting! And your kind words. I&#8217;ve added your blog to my daily reading list.</p>
<p>I agree with you. I think link baiting when combined with reader value is fine, but there appears to be a growing trend where writers appear to forget about the latter and place too much emphasis on the former.</p>
<p>Which leads to a credibility problem, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>I think people are taking the whole link bait concept too far and are forgetting the whole idea of supplying us readers the information we "like" &#38; "want" to read. 

Only in the past week I removed to very well known blogs from my RSS feed because their attempts at link baiting just seems to get worse by the day. I feel very let down by one of them as he was the one that taught me the basics of what I know today but recently his posts have taken a huge nose dive into horse dung. 

Oh and Peter good work on this blog. Long time reader, first time poster. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people are taking the whole link bait concept too far and are forgetting the whole idea of supplying us readers the information we &#8220;like&#8221; &amp; &#8220;want&#8221; to read. </p>
<p>Only in the past week I removed to very well known blogs from my RSS feed because their attempts at link baiting just seems to get worse by the day. I feel very let down by one of them as he was the one that taught me the basics of what I know today but recently his posts have taken a huge nose dive into horse dung. </p>
<p>Oh and Peter good work on this blog. Long time reader, first time poster. <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hooley&#8217;s -ThinkBait-&#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Public Apology</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hooley&#8217;s -ThinkBait-&#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Public Apology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>[...] To the members of SEO / SEM community who don&#8217;t appreciate linkstunting, offline linkbaiting, buzz linking, buzz marketing stunts or whatever you want to call it: I apologize to you as well.Â  I never intended to disrespect anyone and I certainly hope nobody takes any of my campaigns or stunts that way.Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To the members of SEO / SEM community who don&#8217;t appreciate linkstunting, offline linkbaiting, buzz linking, buzz marketing stunts or whatever you want to call it: I apologize to you as well.Â  I never intended to disrespect anyone and I certainly hope nobody takes any of my campaigns or stunts that way.Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchStudent</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3491</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchStudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3491</guid>
		<description>Peter, you might be right about people losing credibility over the "look at me" stuff.  So far it seems the reaction for me was mostly a positive, but I can see it being shunned by some.  But I don't do client work, my career is in the private sector, so my motivation is different than most others in the SEO / SEM world.

I can assure you this- the so called "controversy" is not bait, and I respect the people in the SEO / SEM community immensely.  I'm just a goofball trying to have fun and make a name for myself.  I'm hoping that this little fiasco dies out quickly and the least amount of damage is incurred to all parties involved or who observed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, you might be right about people losing credibility over the &#8220;look at me&#8221; stuff.  So far it seems the reaction for me was mostly a positive, but I can see it being shunned by some.  But I don&#8217;t do client work, my career is in the private sector, so my motivation is different than most others in the SEO / SEM world.</p>
<p>I can assure you this- the so called &#8220;controversy&#8221; is not bait, and I respect the people in the SEO / SEM community immensely.  I&#8217;m just a goofball trying to have fun and make a name for myself.  I&#8217;m hoping that this little fiasco dies out quickly and the least amount of damage is incurred to all parties involved or who observed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When a linkbait goes terribly wrong &#183; SEO Buzz Box</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3486</link>
		<dc:creator>When a linkbait goes terribly wrong &#183; SEO Buzz Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/12/14/link-bait-backfire/#comment-3486</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been observing and thinking a lot about link baiting and how it can negatively influence a website. Today Peter Da Vanzo writes about a link bait backfire but doesn&#8217;t exactly say which site is suffering from it. I know exaclty who Peter is talking about but will not get involved because I would surely become a lightning rod. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been observing and thinking a lot about link baiting and how it can negatively influence a website. Today Peter Da Vanzo writes about a link bait backfire but doesn&#8217;t exactly say which site is suffering from it. I know exaclty who Peter is talking about but will not get involved because I would surely become a lightning rod. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
