<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is DMOZ Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: webgrupnet</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-48650</link>
		<dc:creator>webgrupnet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-48650</guid>
		<description>i dont believe that the dmoz is dead, it is good and referance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont believe that the dmoz is dead, it is good and referance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ehoodia</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-45996</link>
		<dc:creator>ehoodia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-45996</guid>
		<description>I would suggest that the DMOZ business plan was never set out to succeed in the long run. The problem was that there wasn't a proper way to actually monetize their huge coverage over the internet. Naturally if you're cash strapped servers start crashing and editors start putting things on hold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest that the DMOZ business plan was never set out to succeed in the long run. The problem was that there wasn&#8217;t a proper way to actually monetize their huge coverage over the internet. Naturally if you&#8217;re cash strapped servers start crashing and editors start putting things on hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilgi</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-13549</link>
		<dc:creator>bilgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-13549</guid>
		<description>i dont believe that the dmoz is dead . it's alive and it will being alive . it's great link provider for search engines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont believe that the dmoz is dead . it&#8217;s alive and it will being alive . it&#8217;s great link provider for search engines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vistadivine.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>vistadivine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 14:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-4770</guid>
		<description>But I dont know why then owners dont try to make it live again.

Akash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I dont know why then owners dont try to make it live again.</p>
<p>Akash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 06:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/20/is-dmoz-dead/#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>Hooray!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hooray!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
