<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landing Page Uproar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;New market opens for landing page optimization,

Heh heh. Any ideas, Loren? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>New market opens for landing page optimization,</p>
<p>Heh heh. Any ideas, Loren? <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Google arbitrarily decided that their high performing page was low quality.

That&#039;s the problem, eh. It all just seems so arbitrary. 

I think obfuscation is probably a Google modus operandi these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>Google arbitrarily decided that their high performing page was low quality.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the problem, eh. It all just seems so arbitrary. </p>
<p>I think obfuscation is probably a Google modus operandi these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorenBaker</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/comment-page-1/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>LorenBaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 12:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>New market opens for landing page optimization, thanks Google :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New market opens for landing page optimization, thanks Google <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dburdon</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/comment-page-1/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>dburdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/11/16/landing-page-uproar/#comment-2726</guid>
		<description>Pete,

good stuff. I had a client stung for Â£250 ($470), when Google arbitrarily decided that their high performing page was low quality.

I read the Graywolf post. Seems you can&#039;t trust Google with your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete,</p>
<p>good stuff. I had a client stung for Â£250 ($470), when Google arbitrarily decided that their high performing page was low quality.</p>
<p>I read the Graywolf post. Seems you can&#8217;t trust Google with your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

