<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Cutts: &#8220;Keywords In The URL Can Help&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/comment-page-1/#comment-1172</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 09:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/#comment-1172</guid>
		<description>The real meat is often in his comments:

Tim:

&quot;Does having words in the URL increase or decrease the assumed â€œqualityâ€ of the page? Or would it be more appropriate to say â€œcan help search engines judge the subject of a pageâ€?

Matt:

&quot;Tim, including the keyword in the url just gives another chance for that keyword to match the userâ€™s query in some way. Thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™d put it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real meat is often in his comments:</p>
<p>Tim:</p>
<p>&#8220;Does having words in the URL increase or decrease the assumed â€œqualityâ€ of the page? Or would it be more appropriate to say â€œcan help search engines judge the subject of a pageâ€?</p>
<p>Matt:</p>
<p>&#8220;Tim, including the keyword in the url just gives another chance for that keyword to match the userâ€™s query in some way. Thatâ€™s the way Iâ€™d put it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dburdon</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/comment-page-1/#comment-1171</link>
		<dc:creator>dburdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/09/01/matt-cutts-keywords-in-the-url-can-help/#comment-1171</guid>
		<description>It certainly appears to work with blogger posts. The post title becomes part of the extended url. However, a typical blog post title tends to refer to a highly specific and - perhaps - uncompetitive subject or keyword phrase.

In a blogging context an alignment of URL, post title and content creates definite &quot;on page&quot; synergy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly appears to work with blogger posts. The post title becomes part of the extended url. However, a typical blog post title tends to refer to a highly specific and &#8211; perhaps &#8211; uncompetitive subject or keyword phrase.</p>
<p>In a blogging context an alignment of URL, post title and content creates definite &#8220;on page&#8221; synergy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

