White Hat/Black Hat: Dead
These days, following the guidelines won’t necessarily get a webmaster anywhere in the search results. Not following the guidelines won’t necessarily get a webmaster anywhere in the search results, either.
The reason why is easy to see. If a webmaster can directly influence their position in search results, then this puts the webmaster in direct competition with PPC advertising systems. The search engines like anything that helps them make money, and that is why they like some aspects of SEO. They like anything that helps make pages more visible to search engine crawlers, on their terms, and they like that search engines get talked-up/promoted. Get much beyond that, and the webmaster is on a direct collision course with the business case.
Is this bad news for the webmaster? Yes and no. The game is a lot harder than it used to be, and it could be argued that those who are doing the best at the moment lie at either extremes: the whiter-than-white hat who really doesn’t think about search engines at all, and the black-hat, who really doesn’t care about what the search engines think.
Following the rules is unlikely to get you banned, but appearing nowhere in search results is pretty much the same thing.
So, is the old white hat/black hat argument now dead?

August 1st, 2006 at 9:18 pm
[...] Peter Da Vanzo says forget blackhat/ whitehat SEO: there are too many factors to say that such and such a step will help your hinder your rankings. He says the game is harder than it used to be. Nick Wilson of Performancing says SEO is not rocket science. By the way, Graywolf says he’s a grayhat SEO (link is to a pirates book review – so that might explain what he means). [...]
September 1st, 2008 at 4:44 pm
Pure white hat SEO isn’t SEO at all. Google prefers that you simply email authority sites asking for a no strings attached link back.
Grey hat is the only one to wear – effective but not too much to hurt you. It’s like the price is right – how close can you get without going over
Ken
King Cobra Poker