<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out With The New, In With The Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Da Vanzo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Da Vanzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>Laughts. Too true! I think it&#039;s best to go softly-softly. Don&#039;t change too much content, and build links slowly. Mileage may vary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughts. Too true! I think it&#8217;s best to go softly-softly. Don&#8217;t change too much content, and build links slowly. Mileage may vary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoJo</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1021</link>
		<dc:creator>JoJo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/30/out-with-the-new-in-with-the-old/#comment-1021</guid>
		<description>Always been intrigued by those who snap up &#039;old&#039; sites - its been done for a while I know - but unless you know what you are doing it could be easy to rank for &#039;toilet paper&#039; than perhaps your intended &#039;stirling silver&#039; depending of course on what anchors are in place ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always been intrigued by those who snap up &#8216;old&#8217; sites &#8211; its been done for a while I know &#8211; but unless you know what you are doing it could be easy to rank for &#8216;toilet paper&#8217; than perhaps your intended &#8216;stirling silver&#8217; depending of course on what anchors are in place <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

