<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Know How Many Tags The Average Web Page Uses?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/26/do-you-know-how-many-tags-the-average-web-page-uses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/26/do-you-know-how-many-tags-the-average-web-page-uses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halfdeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/26/do-you-know-how-many-tags-the-average-web-page-uses/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Halfdeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/26/do-you-know-how-many-tags-the-average-web-page-uses/#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>The first thing to notice is the huge number of markup errors involving the meta element. Markup such as:



...which results in a meta element with eight attributes, and which doesn&#039;t help anyone (least of all the search engines it&#039;s aimed at, since the second attribute should have been content, not value, and therefore the entire element is likely to be ignored).

http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/metadata.html

Oh ok...so invalid code does sometimes throw Google off (not to rehash the old Amazon/Google doesn&#039;t validate debate or anything).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing to notice is the huge number of markup errors involving the meta element. Markup such as:</p>
<p>&#8230;which results in a meta element with eight attributes, and which doesn&#8217;t help anyone (least of all the search engines it&#8217;s aimed at, since the second attribute should have been content, not value, and therefore the entire element is likely to be ignored).</p>
<p><a href="http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/metadata.html">http://code.google.com/webstats/2005-12/metadata.html</a></p>
<p>Oh ok&#8230;so invalid code does sometimes throw Google off (not to rehash the old Amazon/Google doesn&#8217;t validate debate or anything).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

