<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Much Should You Pay For SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/24/how-much-should-you-pay-for-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/24/how-much-should-you-pay-for-seo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brokerblogger</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/24/how-much-should-you-pay-for-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Brokerblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 23:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/07/24/how-much-should-you-pay-for-seo/#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>&quot;Figure out what your desired outcomes are, and design the SEO campaign, and metrics, around that.&quot;

I totally agree, Peter.  In fact I came up with a general formula to figure out how SEO compensation could be based on &quot;desired outcomes&quot;.

I really would appreciate your opinions on an approach of mine, but I don&#039;t expect you to read all 23 posts I did on the subject.   But, these three below are the crux of the idea.  Anybody is welcome to improve and use the basic idea.

http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_1.html

http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_2.html

http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_3.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Figure out what your desired outcomes are, and design the SEO campaign, and metrics, around that.&#8221;</p>
<p>I totally agree, Peter.  In fact I came up with a general formula to figure out how SEO compensation could be based on &#8220;desired outcomes&#8221;.</p>
<p>I really would appreciate your opinions on an approach of mine, but I don&#8217;t expect you to read all 23 posts I did on the subject.   But, these three below are the crux of the idea.  Anybody is welcome to improve and use the basic idea.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_1.html">http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_1.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_2.html">http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_2.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_3.html">http://www.brokerblogger.com/brokerblogger/2006/02/seo_performance_3.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

