Comments on: Cloaking Not Cloaking http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/19/cloaking-not-cloaking/ Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:23:47 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Peter Da Vanzo http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/19/cloaking-not-cloaking/comment-page-1/#comment-658 Peter Da Vanzo Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:20:35 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/19/cloaking-not-cloaking/#comment-658 I think that Google is fine with the NY Times approach. It may be a different story if you or I tried it, however ;) I think that Google is fine with the NY Times approach. It may be a different story if you or I tried it, however ;)

]]> By: Inetzeal Network http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/19/cloaking-not-cloaking/comment-page-1/#comment-655 Inetzeal Network Tue, 20 Jun 2006 08:38:53 +0000 http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/19/cloaking-not-cloaking/#comment-655 There is one example of BMW. google removed few weeks ago.. but soon it was included again. i don't think same happen with NYTimes.com.. they have PR10 Yet There is one example of BMW. google removed few weeks ago.. but soon it was included again. i don’t think same happen with NYTimes.com.. they have PR10 Yet

]]>