<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Now Checking 200+ Signals To Determine Ranking?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Shapley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SEO and Domain Ownership</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-73775</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Shapley &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SEO and Domain Ownership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-73775</guid>
		<description>[...] its organic search results which is somewhat concerning. What are they.. (The orginal article: Here ) so we all know the basics like backlinks, good HTML and all that Bull [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its organic search results which is somewhat concerning. What are they.. (The orginal article: Here ) so we all know the basics like backlinks, good HTML and all that Bull [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web junkie</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-30999</link>
		<dc:creator>web junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 23:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-30999</guid>
		<description>I've posted a list of 201 potential variables for assessing page rankings in SERPS here: http://leakyboat.info/2007/03/30/if-i-ran-google-201-factors-for-ranking-pages/. Thought you might be interested in my list. 
There are several variables that I've included that I haven't seen much discussion of online.
(trackback didn't seem to work, so I'm doing it manually)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted a list of 201 potential variables for assessing page rankings in SERPS here: <a href="http://leakyboat.info/2007/03/30/if-i-ran-google-201-factors-for-ranking-pages/">http://leakyboat.info/2007/03/30/if-i-ran-google-201-factors-for-ranking-pages/</a>. Thought you might be interested in my list.<br />
There are several variables that I&#8217;ve included that I haven&#8217;t seen much discussion of online.<br />
(trackback didn&#8217;t seem to work, so I&#8217;m doing it manually)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leaky Boat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If I ran Google: 201 factors for ranking pages</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-30897</link>
		<dc:creator>Leaky Boat &#187; Blog Archive &#187; If I ran Google: 201 factors for ranking pages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-30897</guid>
		<description>[...] it was suggested that google uses 200 different features to rank a page. This seems to have caused surprise in some parts:  perhaps Google are now checking for things like wing of bat, ounce of goats intestine and roasted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it was suggested that google uses 200 different features to rank a page. This seems to have caused surprise in some parts:  perhaps Google are now checking for things like wing of bat, ounce of goats intestine and roasted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilgi</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-21226</link>
		<dc:creator>bilgi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-21226</guid>
		<description>when i saw the title of the blog post , i have expected to learn them or learn some of them :D . 

The link contains known thinks but on the other side information on the link was nice :)

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i saw the title of the blog post , i have expected to learn them or learn some of them <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> . </p>
<p>The link contains known thinks but on the other side information on the link was nice <img src='http://blog.v7n.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Man &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Googles Algo - Another Part Revealed.</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Man &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Googles Algo - Another Part Revealed.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>[...] So a while back on the v7n SEO Blog it was revealed that Google is now looking at over 200 signs when sorting its organic search results which is somewhat concerning. What are they.. (The orginal article: http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/Â ) so we all know the basics like backlinks, good HTML and all that Bull Shit. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So a while back on the v7n SEO Blog it was revealed that Google is now looking at over 200 signs when sorting its organic search results which is somewhat concerning. What are they.. (The orginal article: <a href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/06/01/google-nww-checking-200-signals-to-determine-ranking/</a>Â ) so we all know the basics like backlinks, good HTML and all that Bull Shit. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
