<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Base And Why Aggregation Sites Will Be In The Firing Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:23:47 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Oh BTW, you might want to fix the link you have for the text Google Base, it goes to an invalid url.

It should read http://base.google.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh BTW, you might want to fix the link you have for the text Google Base, it goes to an invalid url.</p>
<p>It should read <a href="http://base.google.com">http://base.google.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>It would appear that way, it does seem like a haven for spammers. Although, I might check it out and see what kind of results I receive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that way, it does seem like a haven for spammers. Although, I might check it out and see what kind of results I receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>John Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.v7n.com/2006/04/20/google-base-and-why-aggregation-sites-will-be-in-the-firing-line/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>I considered jumping aboard the Spam Base bandwagon. I even have a note to myself here - &quot;Spam Google Base&quot;. 

But ultimately I decided it wasn&#039;t worth he effort as a long term strategy. The energy put into creating Google Base listings might be justified if Google Base listings lasted longer than they do, but from what I saw they expire in a matter of weeks. 

This is one of the few times I think Google is goofing off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I considered jumping aboard the Spam Base bandwagon. I even have a note to myself here &#8211; &#8220;Spam Google Base&#8221;. </p>
<p>But ultimately I decided it wasn&#8217;t worth he effort as a long term strategy. The energy put into creating Google Base listings might be justified if Google Base listings lasted longer than they do, but from what I saw they expire in a matter of weeks. </p>
<p>This is one of the few times I think Google is goofing off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
